by R. Sasankan
The
art of good governance is to act with speed and refuse to allow
negative externalities like favour and prejudice to cloud one’s
judgment. The Modi government has showed remarkable alacrity in the
manner in which it has handled the findings of the US consultant
DeGolyer and MacNaughton (D&M) which affirmed that there was truth
in Oil and Natural Gas Corporation’s suspicions that Reliance Industries
had been sucking out gas from its KG-D5 reservoir in the Krishna
Godavari basin while drilling in the latter’s adjacent KG-D6 field.
The ONGC management was so convinced about the truth behind its charge
that it filed a case in Delhi High Court and even dragged the Ministry
of Petroleum and Natural Gas into the controversy. Once the US
consultant confirmed ONGC’s suspicion in its report, the government
quickly appointed Justice A.P. Shah to look into the issue within the
short space of three months. The terms of reference are so comprehensive
that the government wants it to find out the “acts of omission and
commission” on the part of RIL, ONGC and the regulator, the quantum of
unfair enrichment of the contractors of the adjacent block, and actions
to make good the loss to ONGC and the government.
This
is how a functioning government should act on a matter of national
interest. Surprisingly, the government refused to display the same
readiness to tackle the crisis arising from the colossal loss that the
country suffered under the skewed terms of the long-term LNG deal
between RasGas of Qatar and Petronet LNG Ltd (PLL). Petroleum minister
Dharmendra Pradhan went on record in parliament a few months ago saying
that the government was examining the report of a committee on the
charges of corruption in the deal. The so-called report was submitted
more than three years ago.
We
are raising the issue as it is relevant in the context of the ongoing
re-renegotiations between PLL and RasGas over the price of LNG under the
long-term supply contract. From all indications, the two sides are
ready to hammer out a solution even though the revised formula has not
been crafted as yet.
The delivered price of Qatar LNG works out to $ 12-13/mmbtu against the
prevailing market price of $ 7/mmbtu. It is in the interest of both
RasGas and PLL to save the contract from complete collapse.
True, PLL is technically a private company by virtue of the fact that
the stakes of the four state-owned oil and gas companies has been
limited to 50 per cent. But it is headed by the secretary in the
ministry of petroleum and natural gas as ex-officio chairman. The status
of a private company exempted PLL from the purview of enforcement
agencies such as the CBI and the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC). The
situation was ruthlessly exploited by the then senior executives of PLL
and a couple of secretaries of the ministry of petroleum and natural
gas who acted like wheeler-dealers.
It
was www.indianoilandgas.com which brought out the scam through a series
of investigative reports. The then petroleum minister Jaipal Reddy
ordered an inquiry into the scam and his information officer, in
writing, confirmed this to us. But as it turned out, the investigation
was carried out by none other than an additional secretary of the
ministry of petroleum and natural gas. It would be ridiculous to assume
that an additional secretary would submit a report against an
organisation that was headed by his boss, the petroleum secretary. The
question will always linger: was Reddy under pressure to cover it up?
This was the report that Pradhan spoke about in parliament.
RasGas was guilty of violating two key provisions of the firm contract.
RasGas was required to provide 7.5 million tons a year of rich gas – i.e
gas from which the higher hydrocarbons had not been extracted. PLL had
insisted on such a condition because the country badly needed rich gas
for its petrochemical industry. The first tranche of 5 million ton per
annum came as rich gas but the second tranche of 2.5 million ton of LNG
was lean gas. How could RasGas violate the provisions of a firm
contract? There is nothing on record to show that it had compensated PLL
for the violation of the contract. www.indianoilandgas.com worked out
the loss to PLL at around Rs 25,000 crore (or Rs 250 billion) during the
entire contract period of 25 years.
I
do not think people who headed the PLL and petroleum ministry were a
bunch of clods. They clearly understood the financial implications of
their silence. RasGas is too big a company to seek a favour from PLL
without compensating it. There is nothing on record to show that PLL got
anything on this account. The compensation must have been so huge that
neither the PLL leadership including the petroleum secretary would have
been able to digest even a fraction of the payoff? So, who pocketed the
sum?
The second violation was equally big. At the time of negotiating the
original firm contract, the Indian side bargained for and secured the
consent of RasGas for a 5 per cent stake in the upstream venture at
Qatar at par value. Similar facilities had been extended to Korean and
Japanese companies who were buying LNG from RasGas. But for some
mysterious reason, the PLL leadership did not exercise this option in
the contract. Who prevailed on PLL to stop it from invoking this vital
provision in the contract? This obviously is another scam.
We had reported the role of a senior bureaucrat who has been acting as
LNG lobby’s ‘ambassador’ in Delhi. He had clambered up the bureaucratic
hierarchy to reach the peak and then secured a superannuated assignment
that conferred on him the status of a Minister of State. He was
instrumental in making the promotion of LNG consumption as a yardstick
to measure the performance of Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas. He
loved LNG immensely.
RasGas has been unkind to PLL. It should make amends because its
reputation is at stake for violating the sanctity of international
agreements. The Indian market is immense. A company like RasGas should
not be seen to be complicit in promoting shady practices. There are
dodgy characters in every country and India has its fair share of
shenanigans, perhaps in greater measure than most other countries. The
Modi government should immediately re-open the entire RasGas deal for
investigation by someone of Justice A.P. Shah’s stature.
To download the latest issue 'Volume 31 Issue 1 - April 10, 2024', click here |