By R. Sasankan
An air of
turbulence hangs heavy over the global petrol industry. Donald Trump has
whipped up a storm once again after the US President slapped onerous sanctions
against Rosneft and Lukoil - two of Russia's energy giants - sending refiners
in India and China scurrying to find alternate sources of crude oil and head
off the threat of crippling levies on their petro-product exports to the US and
Europe.
The tilt towards
Russian oil and gas had begun after the outbreak of the Ukraine war. Over the
past few years, Russia has accounted for almost a third of India's total crude
oil imports, triggered largely by the attractiveness of the price discounts
that President Vladimir Putin has offered to both India and China.
India has been
diversifying its sources of crude oil in an attempt to de-risk its
energy-buying strategy. Until 2022, India had primarily bought its crude oil
from West Asia, which meant that it had become vulnerable to precipitate shocks
in the region arising from political and economic developments.
India has
consistently been looking to widen its options in the global crude oil market.
Just recently, petroleum minister Hardeep Puri announced plans to buy crude oil
from Brazil, opening a new vista of opportunity to beef up its energy security.
"India and Brazil have agreed to expand their partnership in oil exploration and
production, with Indian upstream oil companies like ONGC expected to
participate in upcoming offshore projects in Brazil," Puri said.
The minister's
statement assumes great significance as it comes amid India's deepening dilemma
over its strategy to ensure its energy security. The inescapable truth is that
the contribution of domestically-produced crude in the basket of petroleum
products consumed and exported has been steadily shrinking and has now touched
a low of 11.5 per cent, which means that the country's crude import dependency
is about to touch 90 per cent.
Brazil and India
are the founder members of the BRICS, which is a group of emerging economies
that came together to create a political and diplomatic coordination forum for
countries from the Global South on a range of diverse issues. The other
principal nations are Russia, China and South Africa. The acronym was coined by
British economist Jim O'Neill and the idea caught fire after his employer
Goldman Sachs chose to flag the concept of a group of emerging markets in 2001
that could potentially grow into a global force to reckon with. The group has
since expanded to 11 nations from the original five with the inclusion of
countries like Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt, Iran and Indonesia. BRICS aims to increase
cooperation among members to promote economic and geopolitical integration and
to counterbalance Western-dominated global institutions.
BRICS stoked
controversy recently when it began deliberations on a proposal to fight the
dominance of the US dollar in world trade by encouraging trade settlements in
local currency in order to minimise the impact of economic sanctions and trade
tariffs by the western democracies. The move drew a scathing attack from
President Trump who saw this as a master plan to diminish the dollar's
significance in world trade. He has vowed to crush nations that flirt with the
idea of a BRICS currency or any other move designed to undermine the US dollar.
"BRICS was set
up to hurt us, BRICS was set up to degenerate our dollar and take our dollar,
take it off as the standard," Trump told his cabinet in July and then went on
to threaten 100% tariffs on BRICS nations unless they committed to never create
a "a new BRICS Currency, nor back any other Currency to replace the mighty US Dollar."
Brazil's
President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva has been a strong proponent of a BRICS
currency - an idea that has the backing of Russia but virtually none of the
other members. For all practical purposes, the currency initiative has been
stalled.
But Brazil can
now use another weapon in its arsenal: its oil. Lula can now play this card to
undermine any US plan to grab the Indian market by forcing Delhi to buy its
crude oil instead of Putin's. Brazil has significant proven reserves and a high
production output that makes it the largest oil producer in South America. The
country is among the world's top oil producers and has been a net exporter
since 2011. In 2024, Brazil's average crude oil output was over 3.36 million
barrels per day. It is on track to become an even more significant player in
the global oil industry with some forecasts predicting it will become the
world's fourth-largest oil producer in the next few years.
This brings us
to Prime Minister Narendra Modi's energy security dilemma. India is a very
large country geographically with fairly large sedimentary basins. The
state-owned domestic companies have been drilling in search of oil and the
number of wells they drilled must be close to a world record. ONGC drilled 578
wells in FY25, which is the highest number in the past 35 years. The total
includes 109 exploratory and 469 development wells. It also drilled 544 wells
in FY24, 463 wells in FY23 and 434 wells in FY22. Oil India Ltd, the
second-largest upstream oil company in FY24, drilled 61 wells, the highest
number since its inception, which included 17 exploration and 44 development
wells.
These two Indian
oil giants are not entirely at fault for their failure to discover oil and gas
in the wells they drill. Both companies had periods of success in the past.
India's sedimentary basins are not known to be rich in hydrocarbon reserves. No
known geologist has ever challenged this assessment. Should India persist with
the drilling strategy it has been pursuing so far? The political leadership must
now grapple with this burning issue.
A company like
ONGC is now rated among the largest drillers of dry wells in the world. ONGC
cannot be accused of recklessness or profligacy; the system enjoins it push on
with its drilling plans. Among state-owned companies, ONGC must rank among one
of the biggest owners of drilling rigs. It cannot keep its trained drillers and
other related staff idle as this could blow up into a politically-sensitive
issue. Nor can it afford to keep the rigs idle. At the same time, it must drill
in any location only after checking the prospectivity of the area. The company
has a large pool of geologists and geophysicists. Obviously, their
prospectivity assessments have been wide of the mark.
Perhaps it is
time that a portion of the large fleet of rigs can be deployed overseas if
India is able to corner exploration acreages. For this, the ministry of
petroleum and natural gas has to identify countries where such exploration
activities are possible. Political intervention at the level of prime minister
can influence this strategy.
I would not like
to presume that I can identify these nations. Russia is one nation with which
India already has some arrangement. Prime Minister Modi has very friendly
relations with President Putin but he has now been effectively cornered by
President Trump and the EU. It is not known how and when Putin will react. For
the time being, Russia looks a difficult place for India to strike new business
deals. But there are other countries where India must explore opportunities in
the upstream space - and the initiative must be spearheaded by the country's
political leadership.
To download the latest issue 'Volume 32 Issue 16 - November 25, 2025', click here |